> Nah, what we need is fewer rich people and more women and people of color

Please no sexism, classism, and racism in choosing people. Best people for the job regardless of their income tax bracket or their skin color. Just put people in office that understand how to run a country and limit the powers of government.

> I would no sooner put a anti-gov politician in charge than hire a manager who's opposed to the existence of the team he's managing.

That is how you get ever expanding bureaucracy, regulatory overreach, kingdom building and information silos. Those who can see beyond their own team and work to make their department irrelevant are exactly the kind of people you want as managers in your company.

I am not sure why and how that helps anyone. Japanese Americans and Indian Americans are least politically influential and extremely better off than every other group. On other hand look at Blacks And Irish Americans. Opposite case.

Groups do well when they enjoy freedom, chase opportunities freely, compete and drink less. Not when someone from their community is elected.

You are completely wrong about the manager aspect. A good manager will always keep the team lean, less red tape and maximize the freedom of the team members as well as the customers they are serving. managers on other hand will always claim their more resources which they will spend on their own lavish lifestyle and problems that did not need solving in first place. Obama is a good example.

I would hire a manager who's opposed to the existence of the team he's managing if I didn't like the team he's managing and I thought this was the only way to solve it.

Even if those women, like Hillary, have no idea about encryption, but certainly want to have the government closely control who can have want kinds? In this context, anti-government means the government has no business legislating encryption.