Data ARE freely available on the web. Basically all of it.
Sceptics (I hate calling them sceptics: they don't deserve this term) like to repeat they aren't but don't be fooled by them.
The 'skeptic' branding was a great move on their part, but it's simply not true. It's akin to calling young earth creationists 'evolutionary skeptics'.
Sorry, I'm in China & this site is blocked (for some reason) could someone provide a mirror, or better yet is there a site that I can use to mirror pages in the spirit of imgur.com?
The report reveals that there were no actual temperatures left in the computer database when NASA/NCDC proclaimed 2005 as “THE WARMEST YEAR ON RECORD.”
This sentence leaves me disinclined to continue reading the article. Is this going to be like Fox showing a program about the moon landing conspiracies, following it up a week later with a program debunking the conspiracies?
They're claiming that the averaged temps will be completely different from other, non-averaged temps. Given what averaging is all about, I find this hard to believe. Something doesn't seem right here.
