The only thing that seems to be spreading is the use of the word FUD as well as personal attacks by some people who think they should be rude to those they disagree with. A few conditions have to be met in order for a statement to qualify as FUD: 1/ It has to be false or at least grossly inaccurate, 2/ its falsehood/inaccuracy has to be intentional, and 3/ it has to be negative. My statements fulfill none of those conditions, so relax. It's been a long time (well over a year, if not two, IIRC) since I discussed my bad experience with Scala or said anything negative about it, and for the record, I have never said that Scala is not used successfully by large teams, only that
I have had a very bad experience adopting Scala in a large team, an experience shared by other such teams, and that I believe it may not be a good choice in such circumstances. My opinions are neither overly negative nor uncommon, the only difference is that I was foolish enough to sound them in spite of the rampant rudeness of some who for whatever reason took personal offense. I have also repeatedly said that I realize that that experience isn't universal.
Also, I would appreciate you stop saying that my opinions are misinformed (as they are most certainly not), unless you care to point out my errors. It's OK to disagree, and I don't think you should expect everyone to share the same opinions with you.
BTW, I think that much of the (valid) disagreement stems from a difference in perspective. Some people concentrate on language features, while I could care less whether a language has higher-flavored emojis or subliminal piping. I view those features as means to an end, so first and foremost I care about that end -- what the language aims to achieve -- long before getting to how it aims to achieve it, which, IMO, is only a concern once the goals match your own, otherwise the discussion is purely academic (which may be interesting in its own right, but not my focus).
