One thing that humans will continue to be better at than machines for a very long time is creating interesting stories for other humans. There is no machine that has nearly written a Faulkner novel, or even written up anything more complex than a baseball game (which is itself impressive, though the template is not much more complex than a complicated madlib). When you read machine written stuff, it stinks of the machine that made it. The wriber software is little different at this stage, as evidenced by some of the mangled "ideas" it's generated for others on this thread.
Software and data absolutely have a place in any good editorial strategy, but presuming an algorithm can furnish ideas that will perform better than humans armed with data-driven insights is a mistake in my opinion.
Our content strategists are armed with boatloads of social data, they identify trending topics, top performing articles from competitors etc., and all of that informs the human decisions they make as the editors of their brand publications about what gets written.
At the end of the day, though, I'm going to leave the decision making (and a good part of the ideation) to the talented humans that make up the L&T Co. team.
I'm more compelled by software that helps my team come to data-driven insights themselves than by software that purports to "do the hard part" for them.
The ideas provided are meant to prompt thinking. Sometimes they provide the actual content, but the majority of the time, they help you research your topic (we include a URL in the paid version and allow you take snippets out of sources really easy). This is especially useful if your writers are not all subject matter experts for niche content.
We also do a lot more than provide ideas. For instance, if you're writing for a lot of companies, they may all have style guidelines that you have to follow. Instead of having to remember all the rules, you can customize Wriber to check for them.
- Which organization will make their car look?
- Did dry Wash help someone to clean their car without using water?
- Explore what sort of organization green Shine is?
- Explain how Eco Auto Clean is back at it Again Hey there waterless car wash fans.
I'm guessing its using NLP and some knowledge graph and picking top terms. But still needs work.
- Discuss what sorts of organizations donkey Kong, Diddy, and Cranky are?
- Did Diddy Kong refuse to hand over the banana hoard after what?
- What did the more someone know about miniature donkeys before someone buys?
1. Explain what this blog is.
2. Did the storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing someone call their life?
3. How is someone fucking desu, kid?
4. Are someone sharkbait, fool?
5. What place featured the use of fuck someone in print?
6. How many reason that the word fuck is so hard to trace etymologically is?
7. Explain why fuck was considered the third most severe profanity and its derivative motherfucker second.
8. What are several urban-legend false etymologies postulating an acronymic origin for the word?
9. How did adulterers lock the stocks in village squares sported `FUCK?
10. What times when conquering forces have engaged in rape has been there?
- Examine why dogs will eat poop.
- In what way did many dog owners get very upset when their dog eats poop?
- Is this a wonderful opportunity for their dog to interact with someone?
- Talk about what some dogs are.
- How do some dogs have instincts to carry stuff in their mouths?
- What is the cloud?
First impression: I'm not really sure what the site does.
The first thing I see is the logo, and I don't really know what 'Write better content' means. It's too vague.
I'm then asked to 'Enter three keywords for better content creation'. I still don't know what this means, or why I'm doing this, but I do it anyway, because I want to see what happens.
I searched for 'free online education', at which point it spent a bit of time loading, before coming up with ideas for blog posts (I think!). However, some of these were a bit nonsensical, e.g. 'Whose the inclusion of links to items do not reflect their importance', 'May students also search for courses by subject, language, and institution?', 'Did a few other universities offer online textbooks?'
Conclusion: I don't mind that the algorithm is a bit iffy at the moment, becuase some of the ideas for blog posts were fairly sensible. But the messaging on the site is unclear.
Just my opinion, of course -- and one that doesn't seem to be shared by others here!
I'd pay a lot for that.
Curious about the tech behind the site...
I would personally would like to know how many other people have searched what I was looking for. Say I was allergic to peanuts and looking for alternative and I find out there are so many other guys are searching for the same thing....then I know its a common problem.
I definitely don't want a sales call to show me everything I just saw in the video.
Waiting since last 5 mins :(
Any chance of an API? I'm working on a head mounted display software system that could integrate something like this, not as a writing prompt, but as a conversation prompt with someone.
This site I could take a few of these and go write a few paragraphs about off-the-cuff. Looking forward to playing more when the site comes back up.
This copy made my future hurt.