It may not be that comprehensive yet, but I thought this was interesting:
> Only a small minority of serious vulnerabilities appear to be disclosed anywhere outside a vendor advisory, making it extremely dangerous to rely on press coverage (or any other casual source) for evaluating personal risk.
I've always had a feeling that the cycle of reading an article on publicized security flaw X and then jumping in response to update or replace something immediately was kinda pointless. Seems better to have a regular update schedule and practice good defense in depth than to watch the tech media and obsess over their reports.
