"Filament looks really interesting. It would be possible to dismiss this fledgling business as a hodgepodge of buzzwords, but the credibility of its investor pool, the novel approach it seems to be taking to the problem, and the very real opportunity that exists for IoT networks all combine to make this an interesting play."
edit: a better written version: http://www.coindesk.com/filament-nets-5-million-for-blockcha...
1. I'd be interested to see a bit more about how they will handle systems with actuators as well as sensors - i.e. controlling things like windows and sprinklers. I think IoT gets really interesting when it's not just about sensors.
2. It will be even more interesting to see if people are wiling to allow their nodes to be used to help a neighbour get their data through the mesh. Clearly your node will use more power if it's relaying more data, so I wonder how willing people (for example farmers) will be willing to share resources like that.
1) Our basic Tap has USB and a few analog/digital pins exposed externally for this type of control. We expect USB to be one of the larger factors down the road and are looking at ways to simplify that path.
2) You sir, are thinking well ahead and in the right places.
Feel free to email us with any direct questions! hello@filament.com
http://www.coindesk.com/ibm-reveals-proof-concept-blockchain...
https://www.theprotocol.tv/adept-demo-ibm-samsung/
I wonder why they don't just use IPFS, too.
The file-transfer needs of DIST is simply for a decentralized method of firmware updates--as outlined in the IBM ADEPT paper.